#Antutu benchmark x editor series#
In the second quarter of 2016, Qualcomm brought this technology on 600 series with the Snapdragon 625. For example, the first Qualcomm Processor with 14nm FinFet was Snapdragon 820 which was launched in the last quarter of 2015. These can be found on LG V Series, Samsung Galaxy S Series, Xiaomi Mi Series, OnePlus devices, etc.Īny new feature or technology developed by Qualcomm is usually first implemented in the 800 series and later it comes to the other series. This series offers the best performance among all Qualcomm Processors and this series is mostly used by flagship devices. The 800 series first appeared in the market in 2013. Graphics Processor, GPU Frequency, GPU Raw Performance, Gaming Performance, Rendering Performance, Maximum Display Resolution (UHD, QHD, 1080p, 720p). Power Efficiency and Fast Chargingįabrication Technology Used (28nm, 22nm, 14nm, 10nm, 7nm), Type of Transistor (FinFET), Power Efficiency of Specific CPU Cores, Optimizations, Fast Charging Support, Fast Charging technology Used (QuickCharge 2.0, QuickCharge 3.0, QuickCharge 4.0, QuickCharge 4.0+) Graphics & Display Here are the Parameters that are used to determine the Centurion Mark: Performance & MemoryĬPU Cores, CPU Frequency, Type of CPU Cores (Cortex-A53, Cortex-A72, etc), Whether a Custom Kryo Core is Used, RAW CPU Performance, Single-Core Performance, Multi-Core Performance, Number of Cores, Maximum Memory Supported, Type of Memory (LPDDR2/LPDDR3/LPDDR4/LPDDR4X), Memory Frequency, Number of Memory Channels, Digital Signal Processor. We round off the Centurion Mark to the next significant digitĮven though 652/650 have better raw performance than 630/626/625,Ħ30/626/625 may have compareable/better scores than 652/650 because of their Better Memory, Fabrication Technology, Modem, User Experience, and other Features.Only the Processors launched after 2014 are present in the above list.We also deducted scores from Snapdragon 652, 617, and a few other Processors because of overheating. Snapdragon 810 received a heavy penalty in the score due to Throttling and Overheating Issues.All this makes Centurion Mark the most accurate way of calculating the performance and rankings of Processors. By giving a particular score to its raw performance, real-world performance, chip-level optimization, and user experience, we determine the Centurion Mark. We calculate the score of Performance and Features via an algorithm and then we manually add or deduct score from it based on the User Experience. But if a chip is well-optimized, we make sure to give it extra points. If any processor suffers from lags or overheating in real-world usage, we deduct its score according to the extent of the problem. We calculate Centurion Mark based on a Processor’s Performance + Features + User Experience + Issues. It is not just a benchmark tool or something that simply relies on the raw performance or the specification of a processor. What is Centurion Mark?Ĭenturion Mark is a Processor’s Performance Rating System developed by Tech Centurion. The performance of these chips is below par and should be avoided unless you’re buying an extremely cheap phone with a budget lower than $100. These can suffer from occasional lags as well as throttling issues. The general performance of these chips is below average but it is acceptable in lower-end phones. If you have a low budget, try to get a phone that fits in this category. But some older chips like Snapdragon 810 having poor thermal performance might also fall into this category. But you’re unlikely to observe any lags or any other significant issues. In this range, performance is just above average. If you’re buying a mid-range phone then you should target this range. Great performance is General use as well as gaming.
Selecting a phone with a processor from this category is highly recommended for the best user experience. The processors that scored above 125 on Centurion Mark deliver excellent performance in Gaming as well as Heavy usage. Processors having the same or a close score can be considered as equivalent or similar in performance. *The scores marked with a star are only estimated without real-world testing.įor the ranking of MediaTek processors, visit here. Here’s the above graph in tabular form: Rank
0 kommentar(er)
